VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact csite-022

newcompany claimreported The memo points to NRC licensing; in 2025 Valar's CEO said the NRC 'is wrongly holding jurisdiction' over its project
2025-07-23 · csite-022 · Valar Atomics, Isaiah Taylor, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, E&E News

E&E News (POLITICO; Francisco 'A.J.' Camacho, 23 July 2025) reported that Valar Atomics 'has still not contacted or met with the commission' and quoted CEO Isaiah Taylor: 'If you believe that the jurisdiction is wrong, why would you engage in the process?', and that the NRC 'is wrongly holding jurisdiction' over its Utah project. The article says Valar joined the lawsuit against the NRC in spring 2025 (orig-016); its outcome is tracked elsewhere and was not checked here. The Trust Lands memo and slides, by contrast, present NRC licensing, with Federal Register notice and hearings, as part of the oversight of the Carbon campus, and the slides list 'Decommissioning bond is required by NRC' among the safeguards (csite-010). NRC's website refused our reader (HTTP 403), so whether Valar has since opened any NRC pre-application engagement could not be checked as of 29 September 2026. Valar's own library post of 7 April 2025 says the company is joining the states of Texas, Utah, Louisiana, Florida and Arizona, with Last Energy and Deep Fission, in that lawsuit, and argues that Congress left small reactors to the states. By the company's account, then, the State of Utah is a co-plaintiff in a suit over NRC authority, while a Utah agency's memo presents NRC licensing as a safeguard for the Carbon campus; the suit's current status was not checked.

In plain termsThe public was told the Carbon project would face the NRC's public licensing process. In 2025 the company's chief executive said he believes the NRC should not have authority over its Utah project, and a news report said the company had not engaged with the NRC. Both can be true, and the company may have changed course since. But the public safeguard the state pointed to is one the company has argued, in a lawsuit it joined in 2025, should not apply to reactors like its own.
verified 2026-09-29: Holds as reported (one news report; kind company_claim for the CEO's words). Re-read 2026-09-29: article text (robots.txt allows; quotes exact); memo p. 21; slides p. 49. Headline corrected: 'it had not engaged' is the reporter's statement, not the CEO's. Plain text no longer says the company 'has been fighting' the NRC in court, since the suit's current status was not checked. Second check 29 Sept 2026: added Valar's own 7 April 2025 post (read 29 Sept; quote exact), which confirms the lawsuit and names Utah among the plaintiff states. The CEO's 2025 words still rest on one news report, so confidence stays 'reported'.

In tabs: carbon_site, government, people · file carbon_site