VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact dir-019

newofficial statementconfirmed Utah Attorney General's 2025 report: the NRC case is stayed 'while the NRC considers rule revisions and possible exemptions'
2026-01-22 · dir-019 · Utah Attorney General, State of Utah, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Utah San Rafael Energy Lab

The Office of the Utah Attorney General's 2025 Annual Report (PDF created 22 January 2026) has an item headed 'Challenging federal overreach on small nuclear reactors'. It says Utah joined a multistate lawsuit challenging the NRC's authority to license certain small nuclear reactors, and that the case is currently stayed while the NRC considers rule revisions and possible exemptions. Elsewhere the report says a Government Operations attorney completed the documentation for a research nuclear reactor at the San Rafael Energy Lab; that passage does not name Valar. The report does not mention a settlement. A search of the office's posted news items for 'nuclear' and 'Regulatory Commission' found no release about the case. (Updates safe-028.)

In plain termsIn January 2026, Utah's Attorney General said publicly that the case was paused while the NRC considered changing its rules or granting exemptions. The report did not say the case was settled.
verified 2026-09-30: Skeptic pass 2026-09-30: re-downloaded the 104-page report (18.1 MB; robots allows; created 22 Jan 2026) and re-read the NRC item (p. 48) and the San Rafael passage in context; quote exact. Re-ran the site's post search (WordPress API, 'nuclear' and 'Regulatory Commission'): no release on the case. Wording tightened to show the San Rafael line does not name Valar.

In tabs: safety, government, timeline · file claude_direct