VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact fund-018

newrecordconfirmed Can Valar pay to finish and clean up? Its safety agreement drops the 'Financial' chapter as 'Not required'
2025-10 · fund-018 · Valar Atomics, U.S. Department of Energy, Utah Energy Research Board

Valar's Ward250 Nuclear Safety Design Agreement (Rev. 02, October 2025, marked 'Draft') maps its safety analysis onto the chapters of NUREG-1537, the NRC's guide for research-reactor applications. In that table, 'Chapter 15: Financial Qualifications' is marked 'Excluded' and 'Not required for application' for both the preliminary and final safety analyses, and 'Chapter 17: Decommissioning' is excluded from the preliminary analysis, with an 'approach included in DSA', a document that is not public (safe-007). DOE's request for applications, as summarized by Hogan Lovells, told applicants they bear all costs through decommissioning and spent-fuel storage and asked whether each applicant's funding was 'sufficient to support all phases of reactor testing, from design to decommissioning' (gov-032). DOE's answer on Valar is not public. When the state's Energy Research Board approved the project on 13 Aug 2025, its minutes record only that members discussed 'the project's private funding', returning the site to 'Greenfield' and 'financial assurance for liability' before voting 7-0 (gov-013); no bond, insurance certificate or assurance document for Ward 250 has been found. By contrast, the Carbon County lease requires a reclamation and performance bond before construction (csite-011). Valar has announced large raises since (fund-008), but no public record shows money set aside for decommissioning Ward 250 or storing its spent fuel.

In plain termsValar modelled its safety paperwork on the NRC's guide for research-reactor applications, the kind universities use. That guide has a chapter called 'Financial Qualifications', and Valar's table marks it 'Not required for application'. DOE told applicants they must pay for everything, including cleanup, and asked whether each had enough money, but DOE's answer about Valar is not public. No bond or fund set aside to clean up the Utah test reactor has been found.
verified 2026-09-29: Re-verified 2026-09-29: NSDA Table 2 and Table 7, Hogan Lovells and the Energy Research Board minutes re-read; quotes exact. Plain rewritten to claim only what these sources show about the NRC guide.

In tabs: funding, safety, government · file funding