VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact orig-016

newcompany claimreported April 2025: Valar joins states' suit against the NRC over small-reactor licensing; names 'Ward One'
2025-04-07 · orig-016 · Valar Atomics, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Last Energy, Deep Fission, State of Utah, State of Texas

In a post dated April 7, 2025, Isaiah Taylor announced Valar was joining Texas, Utah, Louisiana, Florida and Arizona, and the reactor companies Last Energy and Deep Fission, in a lawsuit against the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The argument, as Valar summarizes it, is that the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 narrowed federal licensing to reactors significant to defense or public safety, and that a 1956 rule wrongly swept in all reactors. The post says Valar's planned 'Ward One' test reactor is named in the suit. Litigation status and outcome are tracked in government.json.

In plain termsIn April 2025 Valar joined Texas, Utah and other states in suing the federal nuclear regulator (the NRC), arguing small reactors should not need its license at all. Utah, which later hosted Valar's reactor, is one of the states in that suit.
verified 2026-09-29: Verify pass 2 (2026-09-29): post re-read; co-plaintiffs, 1954 Act argument, 1956 rule and Ward One claim match; quote exact. The court docket itself was not read (sources_not_read).

In tabs: overview, timeline, government · file origins