VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact orig-031

newanalysisconfirmed Ward 250's size is described inconsistently: '5 MW' in airlift coverage vs 100 kWt test power
undated · orig-031 · Valar Atomics, World Nuclear News, POWER magazine, American Nuclear Society, Deseret News

Coverage of the February 2026 airlift (World Nuclear News, ExecutiveGov, Deseret News) called Ward 250 a 5 MW or five-megawatt reactor able to power about 5,000 homes. POWER magazine (June 19, 2026) describes it as 100 kWt initial test power, scalable to 5 MWe, and ANS attributes the 100 kWt figure to Taylor; the Utah lab page says the design is meant to scale to 5 MW. Read together, 5 MW appears to be a design or scale-up rating, while the tested reactor is described by Valar at about 100 kW thermal for continuous running, roughly fifty times smaller. Valar's draft safety agreement (NSDA Rev 02) sets 'Maximum continuous power: 100 kWth' and allows 250 kWth for short (1-hour) runs; DOE's categorical exclusion describes Ward 250 as 'a 250 kilowatt thermal (kWth)' reactor. No DOE document stating the authorized power limit was read in this pass (see open questions).

In plain termsNews stories called Ward 250 a '5-megawatt' reactor. Valar's papers put the reactor actually tested at about 100 kilowatts of heat for continuous running, some fifty times smaller; DOE's environmental review describes it as a 250-kilowatt (thermal) reactor. The '5 MW' figure belongs to a bigger future version.
verified 2026-09-29: Verify pass 2 (2026-09-29): POWER ('100 kWt initial test power and scalable to 5 MWe'), WNN, Deseret ('five-megawatt') and ANS re-read; all match. Correction 2026-10-01 (precision review): wording made more exact against the cited records.

In tabs: overview, safety · file origins