VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact orig-034

newrecordconfirmed Ward 250 safety agreement: 100 kWth continuous (250 kWth brief tests), 4.95% LEU TRISO, 12-month life
2025-10 · orig-034 · Valar Atomics, U.S. Department of Energy, Ward 250

Valar's Nuclear Safety Design Agreement for Ward 250 (document 100403 rev 02, October 2025, marked 'Draft' and 'issued for Public Release'; the company says DOE approved it) lists key design parameters: 100 kWth continuous as the license limit, up to 250 kWth for limited tests; TRISO-coated UCO fuel qualified on the AGR program basis; helium coolant at 3.0 MPa; 250 C inlet and 650 C nominal core outlet; a 1.8 m by 1.5 m core of 76 fuel elements holding about 250 kg of heavy metal; 4.95% U-235 enrichment; graphite reflector. It sets a 12-month operating period and an 18-month lifecycle ending in decommissioning and return of the site to unrestricted use, with DOE authorization only and no planned NRC licensing. At a July 2025 Emery County town hall the name was explained as a reference to the nation's 250th birthday on July 4, 2026 (orig-045); the 250 kWth test ceiling is a separate figure.

In plain termsThis is Valar's own summary of the safety design it says DOE approved (the public copy is marked 'Draft'). It sets the power limit (100 kilowatts of heat, briefly up to 250), the fuel (listed as 4.95% enriched uranium) and a 12-month run followed by cleanup. It lists the fuel differently from DOE's later shipping review: see disc-001.
verified 2026-09-29: Verify pass 2 (2026-09-29): NSDA PDF re-read (Table 6, p.52; executive summary; lifecycle section): every parameter matches, including DOE-only authorization and return to unrestricted use. The web post says DOE approved it. Quote exact. Correction 2026-09-29 (calculation audit): plain: DOE's approval is Valar's statement and the copy is marked 'Draft' (detail already said both).

In tabs: overview, operations, safety · file origins