VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact plan-007

newrecordconfirmed The only power data Valar has published is one chart with no time axis, no power units and no date
2026-06-28 · plan-007 · Valar Atomics

Valar's unlisted 'Ward 250 By the Numbers' draft (28 June 2026) embeds a chart titled 'Reactor Power Ascension - TE3401 thermocouples with Q_Total, Power, and Control Bank overlays'. The horizontal axis is 'Sample index' (0 to about 245), not time; no date or clock time appears. A black line 'Q_Total' on an unlabeled right-hand scale of 0 to 100 rises in steps (about 15, about 52, then about 95 to 100) and then drops to near zero around sample 230, when the 'Control Bank Steps' line also falls to zero, which looks like a shutdown. The ten thermocouple lines (TE3401-094 to -105 in the legend) read between about 30 and 80 degrees Fahrenheit, so they are not core temperatures. The title promises a 'Power' overlay that the legend does not show. If Q_Total is in kilowatts, the chart is consistent with a climb to about 100 kW followed by shutdown; the chart itself does not say so, and it cannot show when this happened, for how long, or whether it matches DOE's authorization. No DOE or independent power record has been published to compare it with (plan-006, safe-007).

In plain termsThe one graph Valar has put out looks like a staircase going up to about 100 and then dropping to zero. But the graph has no clock on it, no date, and no units on the power scale, so it cannot prove when the reactor ran, how hard, or for how long. It is a picture of something, not a record anyone can check.
verified 2026-09-29: Verify pass 2026-09-29: chart image re-read directly. The legend lists ten thermocouple channels, not eleven (corrected). Axes 'Sample index' and unlabeled 'Q_Total' confirmed; no date or time. Values are read by eye and approximate.

In tabs: operations, safety · file plans_ops