VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact safe-006

newcompany claimreported The dates of Ward 250's DOE safety approvals come only from Valar: PDSA (Feb 2026), final DSA (Apr 23), readiness review; DOE itself confirms a readiness review took place
2026-04-23 · safe-006 · Valar Atomics, U.S. Department of Energy, DOE Idaho Operations Office, Bob Boston

The NSDA scheduled submittals of the NSDA (22 Sept 2025), PDSA (1 Nov 2025) and final DSA and TSRs (6 Jan 2026), each with a 45-day DOE review, construction complete by 13 April 2026 and initial criticality on 30 June 2026. POWER (19 June 2026) reports preliminary DSA approval in February 2026 and final DSA approval on 23 April 2026; its links for both dates go to Valar's LinkedIn posts, which require a login and were not read. Valar's Castle Country page says Ward 250 operates with 'DOE-approved safety documentation and a completed operational readiness review'. ANS reports, citing Boston's LinkedIn post, that the federal review was led by Bob Boston, a manager at DOE's Idaho Operations Office, and that a joint test group had to sign off on key start-up steps before DOE authorized the criticality test. DOE's 18 June 2026 release calls Ward 250 'the first DOE authorized reactor built outside of a national laboratory' but does not mention the DSA, the readiness review or the startup approval. DOE's categorical exclusion, signed 22 April 2026, already describes what 'the Documented Safety Analysis demonstrates', the day before the reported final approval (it may refer to the DSA as submitted). No DOE document approving the PDSA, DSA, TSRs or startup was found on DOE's sites as of 29 September 2026 (see safe-007). DOE's Office of Environmental Management wrote on 14 July 2026 that its staff took part in DOE's review of the pilot microreactor designs 'from preliminary to final design', and that 17 EM team members took part in the readiness review for the four pilot reactors that went critical by 4 July, naming Ward 250 (dir-031); the article gives no Ward 250 dates or documents. Under 10 CFR 830.207(a), the rule the NSDA names, a contractor may not begin operating a new Hazard Category 1, 2 or 3 facility before DOE issues a safety evaluation report approving its safety basis; DOE's statement that Ward 250 was authorized and went critical fits that step having been completed, though the report itself was not found (safe-041).

In plain termsEach step of the safety review is supposed to end with a DOE approval. The public knows the dates of those approvals only from the company's own posts, repeated by a trade magazine. DOE's public announcement confirms the reactor was authorized and went critical, which means approvals happened, but no public copy of the approvals themselves, or of the conditions they set, was found. DOE has since said, in a July 2026 article by its Office of Environmental Management, that its staff reviewed contractor safety submittals for the pilot microreactors and took part in the readiness review of Ward 250 and three other test reactors before startup (dir-031); the article gives no dates or documents for Ward 250.
verified 2026-09-29: Re-read POWER (links for both approval dates go to Valar LinkedIn posts, checked in the page HTML), ANS, DOE release, Castle Country, NSDA Table 7 and CX signature (22 Apr 2026 07:01 MDT) on 2026-09-29. Holds; ANS's account attributed to Boston's own post. Stays company_claim/reported: approval dates rest on Valar's posts as relayed by one outlet. Correction 2026-10-01 (precision review): wording made more exact against the cited records.

In tabs: safety, government, timeline, process · file safety