VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact safe-014

newanalysisconfirmed Valar's draft accident math puts the nearest public access 400 m away; the host lab is 20.6 acres, too small to hold a 400 m radius
2026-04-22 · safe-014 · Valar Atomics, Utah San Rafael Energy Lab

The NSDA's accident doses are calculated for a site boundary 400 m from the reactor, described as 'the nearest point of public access', with the nearest residence at about 800 m and the nearest group at 1,200 m. DOE's categorical exclusion describes USREL as 'a 20.6-acre site', with Ward 250's reactor complex and fuel laboratory inside a security-fenced area of about 2 acres; ETV News (October 2025) reported Valar's allotment at the lab as 11 acres. A circle of 400 m radius covers about 124 acres (pi x 400 m squared = 502,655 square metres), so no point on a 20.6-acre site can be 400 m from every edge of it. The 400 m boundary must therefore run over land outside the lab, and no record read says who controls public access there. The NSDA's own dispersion factors show why it matters: the one it uses at 100 m is 16 times the one at 400 m (4.0e-3 versus 2.5e-4 s/m3), and its worst-case dose at 100 m is under 5 rem. Our check: the 100 m factor meets DOE's prescribed default, but the 400 m factor is 3.1 to 12.3 times lower than standard rural methods give for the paper's stated weather, so its 400 m bounds may be low by that factor (still far below 25 rem). In August 2026 Valar said it was buying about 110 acres north of the lab from Emery County, and later state records describe the land as purchased (mine-018); that could put more nearby land under Valar's control, but it post-dates the October 2025 NSDA and no record read says whether it covers the 400 m circle. No public copy of the approved DSA's site description, which would define the boundary, was found. DOE's categorical exclusion says 'Radiation monitoring and controlled access are maintained during operations', without saying where. No DOE document read sets 400 m as a required exclusion boundary for Ward 250; it is the distance at which Valar's draft paper calculates public doses.

In plain termsAccident calculations assume the closest a member of the public can get to the reactor. Valar's figure is 400 metres. But the whole state lab it sits on is only about 20 acres, and a circle reaching 400 metres out in every direction would cover about 124 acres. So either public access to land beyond the lab is controlled, which no record read describes (Valar has since bought, or is buying, about 110 acres north of the lab, mine-018, but no record read says whether that covers the circle), or people can get closer than 400 metres, where the calculated doses would be higher. The final safety analysis would show which.
verified 2026-09-29: Re-read NSDA pp. 10, 36 and CX pp. 1-2 and ETV on 2026-09-29; geometry re-checked (pi x 400^2 m2 = 124.2 acres). Holds. Defend pass: added Valar's reported 110-acre purchase (mine-018) as a possible partial explanation, not tied by any record to the boundary. Correction 2026-09-29 (calculation audit): dispersion factors not called concentrations; 'up to 5 rem' now 'under 5 rem'; added the 100 m and 400 m checks. Correction 2026-09-30 (source objectivity review): reworded the plain-language text; reworded the headline. Correction 2026-10-01 (precision review): wording made more exact against the cited records.

In tabs: safety, local · file safety