VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact safe-023

newrecordconfirmed Waste and cleanup: one core of spent fuel to an unnamed 'DOE-approved facility'; site to be returned to unrestricted use
2026-04-22 · safe-023 · U.S. Department of Energy, Valar Atomics, Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control

DOE's categorical exclusion describes the spent fuel as 'a single core loading' to be put in dry storage casks for transport to a 'DOE-approved facility', which it does not name; about 6 months of in-vessel cooldown and 6 months of decommissioning follow 12 months of operation. It estimates under 1 cubic metre a year of solid low-level waste (filters, clothing, small equipment) sent to a licensed disposal site, says no radioactive waste will be left on site after decommissioning, and says the site returns to unrestricted use. The NSDA says defueling will send spent fuel 'to appropriate storage' and decommissioning will return the site to unrestricted use. DOE-STD-1271 lists 'Responsibilities and Liabilities for Decommissioning and Disposition of Wastes' among the topics the DOE contract should cover; that contract (the OTA) is not public, and DOE's reactor-pilot release says companies bear all decommissioning costs (orig-041). Utah's 2026 law exempts interim storage of waste from a DOE-authorized test reactor at a state-owned facility from the state's high-level-waste ban, but only if the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control permits and licenses it; no such permit or application naming Valar was found (csite-023). Where the spent fuel will go, when, and who pays if Valar cannot are not stated in any record read.

In plain termsWhen the test ends, the used fuel has to go somewhere. DOE's paperwork says it will be packed into shielded casks and shipped to a DOE-approved site, without saying which one. Utah law allows it to sit at the state lab for a time only with a state permit, and none has been found. The promise to leave the ground clean is in both DOE's and Valar's documents; the contract that would say who pays if something goes wrong is not public.
verified 2026-09-29: Re-read CX pp. 1, 4, NSDA p. 9 and DOE-STD-1271 sec. 7.1.1 on 2026-09-29. Holds. Spot check: Utah DWMRC's public-notice page (notices 10 Aug-24 Sept 2026) named no Valar, reactor or spent-fuel action; earlier notices were not checked.

In tabs: safety, operations, government · file safety