VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact safe-026

newanalysisreported 'CT scan' spent-fuel claim still on Valar's site; no supporting calculation or correction found there
2026-09-29 · safe-026 · Valar Atomics, Isaiah Taylor

Valar's April 2025 lawsuit post, still online on 29 September 2026, says its analysis indicates that holding spent fuel from its 100 kWt 'Ward One' test reactor (planned life under a month) for five minutes gives radiation exposure equal to a CAT scan. Valar's Ward 250 safety paper, the NSDA, credits reactor shielding that 'cannot be inadvertently defeated', analyses fuel-handling accidents, and plans defueling into storage; DOE's categorical exclusion has the spent core leave in dry storage casks. No Valar correction or published calculation was found. For scale: a CT scan is about 1 to 10 millisieverts (FDA), so five minutes would need 12 to 120 millisieverts an hour; the post gives no amount of fuel, cooling time, distance or shielding.

In plain termsUsed reactor fuel is radioactive; how much depends on the reactor's power, how long it ran and how long the fuel has cooled. Valar said holding used fuel from its planned Ward One test reactor for five minutes would be like one hospital CT scan. No calculation supporting it was found on its website, where the claim remains. For Ward 250, its own safety paper treats radiation shielding as a safety function, and DOE's review has the used fuel leave in dry storage casks.
verified 2026-09-29: Re-read Valar's 7 April 2025 post (claim still present on 2026-09-29) and UIJP (8 July 2025) on 2026-09-29. Holds as reported: 90 seconds (Touran) and 85 milliseconds (a second engineer) are the engineers' calculations as the outlet reports them, not a regulator's finding. Headline softened from 'lethal in seconds'. Correction 2026-09-29 (calculation audit): plain: 'seconds' now 'about 90 seconds'; detail adds the CT-scan dose-rate scale. Correction 2026-09-29 (wording review): removed a quoted phrase that was not Valar's wording. Correction 2026-09-30 (source objectivity review): reworded the headline; reworded the detail; reworded the plain-language text; removed Nick Touran from entities (no longer named in the text); removed the citation of Utah Investigative Journalism Project / Utah News Dispatch (the piece mocks or attacks people personally); now also cites U.S. Energy Information Administration; now also cites U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy.

In tabs: safety, people, overview · file safety