VALAR WATCH
Key findingsTheir claims, annotatedEvidenceTake action
374 facts · 512 sources · updated 2026-09-30

Fact safe-035

newanalysisreported NRC staff can help DOE review pilot reactors, but disputes they raise are settled under a DOE Idaho procedure
2025-10 · safe-035 · Nuclear Innovation Alliance, U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The Nuclear Innovation Alliance's review of the DOE authorization changes says a 2019 DOE-NRC memorandum of understanding, and its Addendum No. 9 signed in October 2025, let NRC employees be detailed to DOE to help with safety reviews such as the DSA, with DOE training them on DOE requirements; that unresolved technical concerns raised by those detailed reviewers are resolved under DOE Idaho Operations Office procedure 01.OP.13 rather than the NRC's differing-professional-opinion process; and that NRC observers who are not detailed remain NRC staff learning for future licensing. It also notes both agencies are operating under constrained resources. Whether any NRC staff took part in the Ward 250 review is not stated in any record read. The addendum itself is on nrc.gov, which refused our reader; this fact rests on NIA's account.

In plain termsDOE can borrow NRC experts to check reactor safety papers. But if a borrowed NRC expert disagrees and the disagreement is not resolved, it is settled by DOE's own Idaho office procedure, not by the NRC. Whether NRC experts looked at Valar's reactor is not public.
verified 2026-09-29: Re-read NIA's review on 2026-09-29. Holds as NIA's account (the addendum itself on nrc.gov was not read).

In tabs: safety, government · file safety